[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210210040805.GB12086@qmqm.qmqm.pl>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 05:08:05 +0100
From: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>
To: Michal Rostecki <mrostecki@...e.de>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
"open list:BTRFS FILE SYSTEM" <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Rostecki <mrostecki@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4/6] btrfs: Check if the filesystem is has mixed type
of devices
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 09:30:38PM +0100, Michal Rostecki wrote:
> From: Michal Rostecki <mrostecki@...e.com>
>
> Add the btrfs_check_mixed() function which checks if the filesystem has
> the mixed type of devices (non-rotational and rotational). This
> information is going to be used in roundrobin raid1 read policy.a
[...]
> @@ -669,8 +699,12 @@ static int btrfs_open_one_device(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices,
> }
>
> q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
> - if (!blk_queue_nonrot(q))
> + rotating = !blk_queue_nonrot(q);
> + device->rotating = rotating;
> + if (rotating)
> fs_devices->rotating = true;
> + if (!fs_devices->mixed)
> + fs_devices->mixed = btrfs_check_mixed(fs_devices, rotating);
[...]
Since this is adding to a set, a faster way is:
if (fs_devices->rotating != rotating)
fs_devices->mixed = true;
The scan might be necessary on device removal, though.
> - if (!blk_queue_nonrot(q))
> + rotating = !blk_queue_nonrot(q);
> + device->rotating = rotating;
> + if (rotating)
> fs_devices->rotating = true;
> + if (!fs_devices->mixed)
> + fs_devices->mixed = btrfs_check_mixed(fs_devices, rotating);
Duplication. Maybe pull all this into a function?
Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław
Powered by blists - more mailing lists