[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87lfbwtjls.fsf@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 10:25:35 +0200
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ath10k@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] ath10k: detect conf_mutex held ath10k_drain_tx() calls
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org> writes:
> ath10k_drain_tx() must not be called with conf_mutex held as workers can
> use that also. Add check to detect conf_mutex held calls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
The commit log does not answer to "Why?". How did you find this? What
actual problem are you trying to solve?
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
> index 53f92945006f..3545ce7dce0a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
> @@ -4566,6 +4566,7 @@ static void ath10k_mac_op_wake_tx_queue(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
> /* Must not be called with conf_mutex held as workers can use that also. */
> void ath10k_drain_tx(struct ath10k *ar)
> {
> + WARN_ON(lockdep_is_held(&ar->conf_mutex));
Empty line after WARN_ON().
Shouldn't this check debug_locks similarly lockdep_assert_held() does?
#define lockdep_assert_held(l) do { \
WARN_ON(debug_locks && !lockdep_is_held(l)); \
} while (0)
And I suspect you need #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP which should fix the kbuild
bot error.
But honestly I would prefer to have lockdep_assert_not_held() in
include/linux/lockdep.h, much cleaner that way. Also
i915_gem_object_lookup_rcu() could then use the same macro.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists