[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YCOzLSqdsr83xf0b@atomide.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:19:25 +0200
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To: Hector Martin 'marcan' <marcan@...can.st>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
soc@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/18] arm64: apple: Add initial Mac Mini 2020 (M1)
devicetree
* Hector Martin 'marcan' <marcan@...can.st> [210208 12:05]:
> On 08/02/2021 20.04, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
...
> > > + clk24: clk24 {
> >
> > Just "clock". Node names should be generic.
>
> Really? Almost every other device device tree uses unique clock node names.
Yeah please just use generic node name "clock". FYI, we're still hurting
because of this for the TI clock node names years after because the drivers
got a chance to rely on the clock node name..
Using "clock" means your clock driver code won't get a chance to wrongly
use the node name and you avoid similar issues.
Regards,
Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists