[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.23.451.2102101034050.25339@localhost>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 10:34:41 +0000 (GMT)
From: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
To: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
cc: brendanhiggins@...gle.com, davidgow@...gle.com,
alan.maguire@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kunit-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
skhan@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] kunit: fail tests on UBSAN errors
On Tue, 9 Feb 2021, Daniel Latypov wrote:
> v1 by Uriel is here: [1].
> Since it's been a while, I've dropped the Reviewed-By's.
>
> It depended on commit 83c4e7a0363b ("KUnit: KASAN Integration") which
> hadn't been merged yet, so that caused some kerfuffle with applying them
> previously and the series was reverted.
>
> This revives the series but makes the kunit_fail_current_test() function
> take a format string and logs the file and line number of the failing
> code, addressing Alan Maguire's comments on the previous version.
>
> As a result, the patch that makes UBSAN errors was tweaked slightly to
> include an error message.
>
> v2 -> v3:
> Fix kunit_fail_current_test() so it works w/ CONFIG_KUNIT=m
> s/_/__ on the helper func to match others in test.c
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20200806174326.3577537-1-urielguajardojr@gmail.com/
>
For the series:
Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@...cle.com>
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists