[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75Vfai3cdBmxqE1mW27xj=+E2aWRoVfN-6mXw0miMAe-Exg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 13:47:39 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
roman.fietze@...na.com, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3][RESEND] add support for never printing hashed addresses
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:33 AM Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> [accidentally sent from the wrong email address, so resending]
>
> [The list of email addresses on CC: is getting quite lengthy,
> so I hope I've included everyone.]
>
> Although hashing addresses printed via printk does make the
> kernel more secure, it interferes with debugging, especially
> with some functions like print_hex_dump() which always uses
> hashed addresses.
>
> To avoid having to choose between %p and %px, it's easier to
> add a kernel command line that treats all %p as %px. This
> encourages developers to use %p more without making debugging
> more difficult.
>
> Patches #1 and #2 upgrade the kselftest framework so that
> it can report on tests that were skipped outright. This
> is needed for the test_printf module which will now skip
> %p hashing tests if hashing is disabled.
>
> Patch #2 upgrades the printf library to check the command
> line. It also updates test_printf().
It's a bit hard in some mailers (like Gmail) to see the different
versions of your patches.
Can you use in the future
- either `git format-patch -v<N> ...`, where <N> is a version
- or `git format-patch --subject-prefix="PATCH vX / RESEND / etc" ...`
?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists