linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] MIPS: make kgdb depend on FPU support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2102101252580.35623@angie.orcam.me.uk>
Date:   Wed, 10 Feb 2021 13:11:28 +0100 (CET)
From:   "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...am.me.uk>
To:     Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
        Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
        Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] MIPS: make kgdb depend on FPU support

On Wed, 10 Feb 2021, Daniel Thompson wrote:

> >  Wrapping the relevant parts of this file into #ifdef MIPS_FP_SUPPORT 
> > would be as easy though and would qualify as a proper fix given that we 
> > have no XML description support for the MIPS target (so we need to supply 
> > the inexistent registers in the protocol; or maybe we can return NULL in 
> > `dbg_get_reg' to get them padded out in the RSP packet, I haven't checked 
> > if generic KGDB code supports this feature).
> 
> Returning NULL should be fine.
> 
> The generic code will cope OK. The values in the f.p. registers may
> act a little odd if gdb uses a 'G' packet to set them to non-zero values
> (since kgdb will cache the values gdb sent it) but the developer
> operating the debugger will probably figure out what is going on without
> too much pain.

 Ack, thanks!

 NB if GDB sees a register padded out (FAOD it means all-x's rather than a 
hex string placed throughout the respective slot) in a `g' packet, then it 
will mark the register internally as "unavailable" and present it to the 
receiver of the information as such rather than giving any specific value.  
I don't remember offhand what the syntax for the `G' packet is in that 
case; possibly GDB just sends all-zeros, and in any case you can't make 
GDB write any specific value to such a register via any user interface.

 The way the unavailability is shown depends on the interface used, i.e. 
it will be different between the `info all-registers'/`info register $reg' 
commands, and the `p $reg' command (or any expression involving `$reg'), 
and the MI interface.  But in any case it will be unambiguous.

 In no case however there will be user confusion for such registers.

  Maciej