[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210211172026.GL308988@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 17:20:26 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
roman.fietze@...na.com, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
akinobu.mita@...il.com, glider@...gle.com,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] [v3] lib/vsprintf: debug_never_hash_pointers prints
all addresses as unhashed
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 11:08:12AM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
>
>
> On 2/11/21 6:31 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Can we make this something shorter? Clearly you don't want people
> > placing this in their grub config, so they'll be most likely typing
> > this a lot...
> >
> > debug_pointers or debug_ptrs would be better.
>
> dbg_unhash_ptrs? "debug_ptrs" is too vague IMHO, and I want to keep the
> word "hash" somewhere there to indicate exactly what's happening.
no_hash_pointers ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists