linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] x509: Add support for parsing x509 certs with ECDSA keys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 11 Feb 2021 12:30:52 -0500
From:   Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, dhowells@...hat.com,
        zohar@...ux.ibm.com
Cc:     kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        patrick@...terwijk.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/4] x509: Add support for parsing x509 certs with
 ECDSA keys

On 2/11/21 3:03 AM, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
>
>>> crypto/asymmetric_keys/public_key.c:97: undefined reference to `parse_OID'


So the issue is that  only ASYMMETRIC_PUBLIC_KEY_SUBTYPE is selected in 
this config and the selection of OID_REGISTRY is missing. I am not sure 
whether ASYMMETRIC_PUBLIC_KEY_SUBTYPE should/could select OID_REGISTRY 
or whether that would be wrong... ?


     Stefan