[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOd=9Xx=w6vWq8Tb160dM3a9uDPNCP-Yt0it7E0804HxnsQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 10:30:25 -0800
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
Julien Thierry <jthierry@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 0/7] objtool x86 decoder fixes
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 9:40 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Since I had to look at instruction decoding for the stack swizzle thing, I
> ended up with a few more changes to the objtool x86 decoder.
>
> These patches are lightly tested (they build defconfig and allmodconfig using
> GCC10), but older versions have seen some robot exposure and other compilers.
Did a quick test of x86_64 defconfig on -next with
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/commit/?h=objtool/core&id=2a512829840eb97a8b52eca7058e56d484468f2d
and ToT LLVM. No new warnings/issues observed during a build.
Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
>
> v2:
> - actually Cc'ed LKML :/
>
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists