[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <161301409895.1254594.6980739457487251623@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 19:28:18 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Michael Tretter <m.tretter@...gutronix.de>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] soc: xilinx: vcu: remove deadcode on null divider check
Quoting Colin King (2021-02-10 10:49:38)
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> The pointer 'divider' has previously been null checked followed by
> a return, hence the subsequent null check is redundant deadcode
> that can be removed. Clean up the code and remove it.
>
> Fixes: 9c789deea206 ("soc: xilinx: vcu: implement clock provider for output clocks")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c b/drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c
> index d66b1315114e..607936d7a413 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c
> @@ -512,9 +512,6 @@ static void xvcu_clk_hw_unregister_leaf(struct clk_hw *hw)
>
> mux = clk_hw_get_parent(divider);
> clk_hw_unregister_mux(mux);
> - if (!divider)
> - return;
> -
This code is pretty confusing. Waiting for m.tretter@...gutronix.de to
reply
> clk_hw_unregister_divider(divider);
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists