linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] mfd: max8997: Add of_compatible to extcon and charger mfd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210211221132.5e8d156c.timon.baetz@protonmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 11 Feb 2021 21:11:52 +0000
From:   Timon Baetz <timon.baetz@...tonmail.com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] mfd: max8997: Add of_compatible to extcon and charger mfd_cell

On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 09:55:22 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2020, Timon Baetz wrote:
> 
> > Add of_compatible ("maxim,max8997-muic") to the mfd_cell to have a
> > of_node set in the extcon driver.
> >
> > Add of_compatible ("maxim,max8997-battery") to the mfd_cell to configure
> > the charger driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Timon Baetz <timon.baetz@...tonmail.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/mfd/max8997.c | 4 ++--
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)  
> 
> Applied, thanks.

Once https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210130172747.2022977-1-timon.baetz@protonmail.com/
gets accepted, this is not needed anymore. Can this be reverted or
should I create a new patch?

Thanks,
Timon