[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b72884f9432e9f16d2f03c10011dce5557cbded9.camel@fi.rohmeurope.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 07:15:53 +0000
From: "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
To: "lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC: "lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linux-power <linux-power@...rohmeurope.com>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com" <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
"geert+renesas@...der.be" <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] mfd: bd9576: Add IRQ support
Hello Again Lee & All,
On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 09:01 +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 15:25 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Jan 2021, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > + /* BD9573 only supports fatal IRQs which we do not
> > > handle */
> >
> > Why not?
>
> Because 'fatal' in the context of this comment means that when this
> condition occurs the PMIC will do emergency shut down for power
> outputs
After having a fresh look at this I see the wisdom in your comment. The
HW provides IRQs and if they are listed in DT for BD9573 does not mean
we should stop here. Thanks for pointing it out.
Best Regards
Matti Vaittinen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists