linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] pinctrl: pinmux: Add pinmux-select debugfs file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210211073938.GL20820@kadam>
Date:   Thu, 11 Feb 2021 10:39:38 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
        Jason Kridner <jkridner@...gleboard.org>,
        Robert Nelson <robertcnelson@...gleboard.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] pinctrl: pinmux: Add pinmux-select debugfs file

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:24:23PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-02-11 at 10:11 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 02:28:54PM -0800, Drew Fustini wrote:
> > > +	ret = strncpy_from_user(buf, user_buf, PINMUX_MAX_NAME * 2);
> > > +	if (ret < 0) {
> > > +		dev_err(pctldev->dev, "failed to copy buffer from userspace");
> > > +		goto free_gname;
> > > +	}
> > > +	buf[len-1] = '\0';
> > > +
> > > +	ret = sscanf(buf, "%s %s", fname, gname);
> > > +	if (ret != 2) {
> > > +		dev_err(pctldev->dev, "expected format: <function-name> <group-name>");
> > > +		goto free_gname;
> > 
> > We need a "ret = -EINVAL;" before the goto.  sscanf doesn't return error
> > codes.  Normally we would write it like so:
> > 
> > 	if (sscanf(buf, "%s %s", fname, gname) != 2) {
> > 		dev_err(pctldev->dev, "expected format: <function-name> <group-name>");
> > 		ret = -EINVAL;
> > 		goto free_gname;
> > 	}
> > 
> > I'm going to write a Smatch check for this today.
> 
> It's a pretty frequently used style:
> 
> $ git grep -P '\w+\s*=\s+sscanf\b' | wc -l
> 327

Yeah.  That's true.  I looked through a couple of those and they were
fine.  (Sample size 2)  But the other format is more common.

$ git grep sscanf | grep = | wc -l
803

I have written a Smatch check to complain whenever we propogate the
return value from sscanf.  I'll let you know tomorrow how that goes.

I should write another check which says "On this error path, we know
sscanf was not equal to the value we wanted but we are still returning
success".

regards,
dan carpenter