[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210211075356.GC2696@kadam>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 10:53:56 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: karthik alapati <mail@...thek.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: remove obsolete commented out code
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:40:41AM +0530, karthik alapati wrote:
> fix some checkpatch "Block comments use * on subsequent lines"
> warnings and remove obsolete code
>
This isn't the correct commit message. It should say something like:
"There is a bunch of messy, commented out code. Just delete it."
> Suggested-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: karthik alapati <mail@...thek.com>
> ---
> .../staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_phycfg.c | 44 ++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_phycfg.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_phycfg.c
> index 1fd504181..3d22bd304 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_phycfg.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/hal/rtl8723b_phycfg.c
> @@ -57,8 +57,6 @@ u32 PHY_QueryBBReg_8723B(struct adapter *Adapter, u32 RegAddr, u32 BitMask)
> return 0;
> #endif
>
> - /* RT_TRACE(COMP_RF, DBG_TRACE, ("--->PHY_QueryBBReg(): RegAddr(%#lx), BitMask(%#lx)\n", RegAddr, BitMask)); */
> -
> OriginalValue = rtw_read32(Adapter, RegAddr);
> BitShift = phy_CalculateBitShift(BitMask);
>
> @@ -94,8 +92,6 @@ void PHY_SetBBReg_8723B(
> return;
> #endif
>
> - /* RT_TRACE(COMP_RF, DBG_TRACE, ("--->PHY_SetBBReg(): RegAddr(%#lx), BitMask(%#lx), Data(%#lx)\n", RegAddr, BitMask, Data)); */
> -
> if (BitMask != bMaskDWord) { /* if not "double word" write */
> OriginalValue = rtw_read32(Adapter, RegAddr);
> BitShift = phy_CalculateBitShift(BitMask);
> @@ -159,13 +155,9 @@ static u32 phy_RFSerialRead_8723B(
> if (RfPiEnable) {
> /* Read from BBreg8b8, 12 bits for 8190, 20bits for T65 RF */
> retValue = PHY_QueryBBReg(Adapter, pPhyReg->rfLSSIReadBackPi|MaskforPhySet, bLSSIReadBackData);
> -
> - /* RT_DISP(FINIT, INIT_RF, ("Readback from RF-PI : 0x%x\n", retValue)); */
> } else {
> /* Read from BBreg8a0, 12 bits for 8190, 20 bits for T65 RF */
> retValue = PHY_QueryBBReg(Adapter, pPhyReg->rfLSSIReadBack|MaskforPhySet, bLSSIReadBackData);
> -
> - /* RT_DISP(FINIT, INIT_RF, ("Readback from RF-SI : 0x%x\n", retValue)); */
> }
> return retValue;
>
> @@ -230,15 +222,13 @@ static void phy_RFSerialWrite_8723B(
> /* */
> /* Put write addr in [5:0] and write data in [31:16] */
> /* */
> - /* DataAndAddr = (Data<<16) | (NewOffset&0x3f); */
> - DataAndAddr = ((NewOffset<<20) | (Data&0x000fffff)) & 0x0fffffff; /* T65 RF */
> + DataAndAddr = ((NewOffset<<20) | (Data&0x000fffff)) & 0x0fffffff;
> + /* T65 RF */
The patch is supposed to be deleting code so we don't want any + lines
which change code. Only deletes. Also don't put the coment after the
the code which it's commenting on.
> @@ -761,20 +745,20 @@ static void phy_PostSetBwMode8723B(struct adapter *Adapter)
>
> PHY_SetBBReg(Adapter, rFPGA1_RFMOD, bRFMOD, 0x1);
>
> - /* Set Control channel to upper or lower. These settings are required only for 40MHz */
> + /**
> + * Set Control channel to upper or lower. These settings are required only
> + * for 40MHz
> + */
Yeah. Get rid of these plus lines and resend.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists