linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH v3] MAINTAINERS: add Dan Murphy as TI LP8xxx drivers maintainer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210211090516.gpcydiit6lmc6m5h@kozik-lap>
Date:   Thu, 11 Feb 2021 10:05:16 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v3] MAINTAINERS: add Dan Murphy as TI LP8xxx
 drivers maintainer

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 09:03:27AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Feb 2021, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:33:49AM -0600, Dan Murphy wrote:
> > > Krzysztof
> > > 
> > > On 2/10/21 11:29 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > > Milo Kim's email in TI bounces with permanent error (550: Invalid
> > > > recipient).  Last email from him on LKML was in 2017.  Move Milo Kim to
> > > > credits and add Dan Murphy from TI to look after:
> > > >   - TI LP855x backlight driver,
> > > >   - TI LP8727 charger driver,
> > > >   - TI LP8788 MFD (ADC, LEDs, charger and regulator) drivers.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> > > > Cc: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately I need to remove my ACK.  My TI email will be disabled this
> > > Friday.
> > > 
> > > No replacement has been identified
> > 
> > Ah, then I propose to mark entries as orphaned - without any maintainer.
> > Other option is to remove them entirely so they will be covered by
> > regular power supply entry.
> > 
> > Any preferences here?
> 
> Counter-proposal: Since they are driver-level entries, just remove
> them altogether.  They are not orphaned as they will still come under
> the subsystem umbrella.

I also vote for this (that was actually my v1 of this patch).

Best regards,
Krzysztof