[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210211095700.158960-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:57:00 +0000
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Michael Tretter <m.tretter@...gutronix.de>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next][V2] soc: xilinx: vcu: fix error check on clk_hw_get_parent call
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Currently the check for failur on the call to clk_hw_get_parent
is checking for a null return in the divider pointer instead of
checking the mux pointer. Fix this.
Thanks to Michael Tretter for suggesting the correct fix.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Logically Dead Code")
Fixes: 9c789deea206 ("soc: xilinx: vcu: implement clock provider for output clocks")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
V2: Check on mux pointer rather than removing deadcode that wasn't
actually really dead code.
---
drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c b/drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c
index d66b1315114e..256b8c4b9ee4 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/xilinx/xlnx_vcu.c
@@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ static void xvcu_clk_hw_unregister_leaf(struct clk_hw *hw)
mux = clk_hw_get_parent(divider);
clk_hw_unregister_mux(mux);
- if (!divider)
+ if (!mux)
return;
clk_hw_unregister_divider(divider);
--
2.30.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists