[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d177302a-3050-41db-cf44-6d614fd0c3a0@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 10:14:01 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
syzbot <syzbot+95ce4b142579611ef0a9@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Valentina Manea <valentina.manea.m@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: general protection fault in tomoyo_socket_sendmsg_permission
(Dropping LSM ML because this is not a TOMOYO's bug.)
On 2021/02/11 4:29, Shuah Khan wrote:
> This is a good find. I already replied to the thread to send a complete
> fix.
As I said at https://lkml.kernel.org/r/f8cae6b1-8f84-0e6a-7d9c-fc4aec68f07b@i-love.sakura.ne.jp ,
the as-is patch is effectively a complete fix. And applying the as-is patch should help spending
syzbot resources for reproducing "general protection fault in tomoyo_socket_sendmsg_permission"
with debug printk() patch applied, which in turn will help you in
> Right. I would like to get a clear understanding of how this condition
> is triggered. I am not saying this isn't a problem. Understanding how
> it is triggered helps find the best fix.
part. Therefore, I strongly expect you to apply this version now.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists