[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b68b7547-5be4-c823-d015-febb5e7f84e9@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 12:58:48 +0100
From: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-test-robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/surface: aggregator: Fix access of unaligned
value
On 2/11/21 11:22 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:04:11AM +0100, Maximilian Luz wrote:
>> The raw message frame length is unaligned and explicitly marked as
>> little endian. It should not be accessed without the appropriatte
>> accessor functions. Fix this.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Though a few nit-picks below.
>
>> Reported-by: kernel-test-robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> Fixes: c167b9c7e3d6 ("platform/surface: Add Surface Aggregator subsystem")
>> Signed-off-by: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/platform/surface/aggregator/ssh_packet_layer.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/surface/aggregator/ssh_packet_layer.c b/drivers/platform/surface/aggregator/ssh_packet_layer.c
>> index 583315db8b02..9a78188d8d1c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/surface/aggregator/ssh_packet_layer.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/surface/aggregator/ssh_packet_layer.c
>> @@ -1774,7 +1774,8 @@ static size_t ssh_ptl_rx_eval(struct ssh_ptl *ptl, struct ssam_span *source)
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> - return aligned.ptr - source->ptr + SSH_MESSAGE_LENGTH(frame->len);
>> + return aligned.ptr - source->ptr
>> + + SSH_MESSAGE_LENGTH(get_unaligned_le16(&frame->len));
>
> I would leave + on previous line.
I can fix that if it bugs you.
> Also it's possible to annotate temporary variable and use it, but it seems not
> worth to do.
Now that you mention it, we already have the correct frame length in
payload.len. Let me draft up a new patch with that.
> Side question: Do you think the below is correct (& operator)?
>
> sp.len = get_unaligned_le16(&((struct ssh_frame *)sf.ptr)->len);
>
> To me seems like you take an address to len member rather its value.
That's the point though, no? The signature is
u16 get_unaligned_le16(const void *p)
so we do want a pointer to the len member. So I believe that is correct.
>
>> }
>>
>> static int ssh_ptl_rx_threadfn(void *data)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists