lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20210211130625.GA20155@lst.de> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 14:06:25 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> To: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...gle.com>, "open list:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com> Subject: Re: add a new dma_alloc_noncontiguous API v2 On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:08:18AM +0100, Ricardo Ribalda wrote: > Hi Christoph > > What are your merge plans for the uvc change? > http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/dma-mapping.git/commit/3dc47131f8aacc2093f68a9971d24c754e435520 > > Are you going to remove the patch on your Merge request and then send > it for review to Laurent? or merge it through your tree with a S-o-B > him? I though I had all the ACKs to queue it up. Is that not what was intended? Queueing up the API without a user is generally a bad idea.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists