[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YCU1qRtI2zXy7xFr@alley>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 14:48:25 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, linux@...musvillemoes.dk,
shuah@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] lib: vsprintf: Fix handling of number field
widths in vsscanf
On Tue 2021-02-09 15:56:02, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> The existing code attempted to handle numbers by doing a strto[u]l(),
> ignoring the field width, and then repeatedly dividing to extract the
> field out of the full converted value. If the string contains a run of
> valid digits longer than will fit in a long or long long, this would
> overflow and no amount of dividing can recover the correct value.
>
> This patch fixes vsscanf() to obey number field widths when parsing
> the number.
>
> A new _parse_integer_limit() is added that takes a limit for the number
> of characters to parse. The number field conversion in vsscanf is changed
> to use this new function.
>
> If a number starts with a radix prefix, the field width must be long
> enough for at last one digit after the prefix. If not, it will be handled
> like this:
>
> sscanf("0x4", "%1i", &i): i=0, scanning continues with the 'x'
> sscanf("0x4", "%2i", &i): i=0, scanning continues with the '4'
>
> This is consistent with the observed behaviour of userland sscanf.
>
> Note that this patch does NOT fix the problem of a single field value
> overflowing the target type. So for example:
>
> sscanf("123456789abcdef", "%x", &i);
>
> Will not produce the correct result because the value obviously overflows
> INT_MAX. But sscanf will report a successful conversion.
>
> Note that where a very large number is used to mean "unlimited", the value
> INT_MAX is used for consistency with the behaviour of vsnprintf().
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
The patchset looks ready for upstream from my POV.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists