lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210211150759.506f3463@xps13>
Date:   Thu, 11 Feb 2021 15:07:59 +0100
From:   Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc:     Md Sadre Alam <mdalam@...eaurora.org>,
        boris.brezillon@...labora.com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vigneshr@...com,
        sricharan@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] mtd: rawnand: qcom: update last code word register

Hello,

Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org> wrote on Wed,
10 Feb 2021 14:31:44 +0530:

> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 03:09:19AM +0530, Md Sadre Alam wrote:
> > From QPIC version 2.0 onwards new register got added to
> > read last codeword. This change will add the READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_n
> > register.
> > 
> > For first three code word READ_LOCATION_n register will be
> > use.For last code word READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_n register will be
> > use.

Sorry for the late notice, I think the patch is fine but if you don't
mind I would like to propose a small change that should simplify your
patch a lot, see below.

> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <mdalam@...eaurora.org>  
> 
> Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> 
> Thanks,
> Mani
> 
> > ---
> > [V4]
> >  * Modified condition for nandc_set_read_loc_last() in qcom_nandc_read_cw_raw().
> >  * Added one additional argument "last_cw" to the function config_nand_cw_read()
> >    to handle last code word condition.
> >  * Changed total number of last code word register "NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0" to 4
> >    while doing code word configuration.
> >  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> > index 667e4bf..9484be8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
> > @@ -48,6 +48,10 @@
> >  #define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_1		0xf24
> >  #define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_2		0xf28
> >  #define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_3		0xf2c
> > +#define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0	0xf40
> > +#define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_1	0xf44
> > +#define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_2	0xf48
> > +#define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_3	0xf4c
> >  
> >  /* dummy register offsets, used by write_reg_dma */
> >  #define	NAND_DEV_CMD1_RESTORE		0xdead
> > @@ -187,6 +191,12 @@ nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_##reg,			\
> >  	      ((size) << READ_LOCATION_SIZE) |			\
> >  	      ((is_last) << READ_LOCATION_LAST))
> >  
> > +#define nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, reg, offset, size, is_last)	\
> > +nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_##reg,			\
> > +	      ((offset) << READ_LOCATION_OFFSET) |		\
> > +	      ((size) << READ_LOCATION_SIZE) |			\
> > +	      ((is_last) << READ_LOCATION_LAST))
> > +

You could rename the macro nandc_set_read_loc() into
nandc_set_read_loc_first() or anything else that make sense, then have
a helper which does:

nandc_set_read_loc()
{
	if (condition for first)
		return nandc_set_read_loc_first();
	else
		return nandc_set_read_loc_last();
}

And in the rest of your patch you won't have to touch anything else.

Thanks,
Miquèl

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ