[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <df170d15-f5b5-4238-f998-5b8f8e45849a@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 15:50:05 +0000
From: Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@...labora.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
Cc: will@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
jonathanh@...dia.com, vdumpa@...dia.com, thierry.reding@...il.com,
joro@...tes.org, kernel@...labora.com,
Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
"kernelci-results@...ups.io" <kernelci-results@...ups.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 4/5] iommu/tegra-smmu: Rework
tegra_smmu_probe_device()
On 10/02/2021 08:20, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> Hi Guillaume,
>
> On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 01:40:13PM +0000, Guillaume Tucker wrote:
>>> It'd be nicer if I can get both logs of the vanilla kernel (failing)
>>> and the commit-reverted version (passing), each applying this patch.
>>
>> Sure, I've run 3 jobs:
>>
>> * v5.11-rc6 as a reference, to see the original issue:
>> https://lava.collabora.co.uk/scheduler/job/3187848
>>
>> * + your debug patch:
>> https://lava.collabora.co.uk/scheduler/job/3187849
>>
>> * + the "breaking" commit reverted, passing the tests:
>> https://lava.collabora.co.uk/scheduler/job/3187851
>
> Thanks for the help!
>
> I am able to figure out what's probably wrong, yet not so sure
> about the best solution at this point.
>
> Would it be possible for you to run one more time with another
> debugging patch? I'd like to see the same logs as previous:
> 1. Vanilla kernel + debug patch
> 2. Vanilla kernel + Reverted + debug patch
As it turns out, next-20210210 is passing all the tests again so
it looks like this got fixed in the meantime:
https://lava.collabora.co.uk/scheduler/job/3210192
https://lava.collabora.co.uk/results/3210192/0_igt-kms-tegra
And here's a more extensive list of IGT tests on next-20210211,
all the regressions have been fixed:
https://kernelci.org/test/plan/id/60254c42f51df36be53abe62/
I haven't run a reversed bisection to find the fix, but I guess
it wouldn't be too hard to find out what happened by hand anyway.
I see the drm/tegra/for-5.12-rc1 tag has been merged into
linux-next, maybe that solved the issue?
FYI I've also run some jobs with your debug patch and with the
breaking patch reverted:
https://lava.collabora.co.uk/scheduler/job/3210245
https://lava.collabora.co.uk/scheduler/job/3210596
Meanwhile I'll see what can be done to improve the automated
bisection so if there are new IGT regressions they would get
reported earlier. I guess it would have saved us all some time
if it had been bisected in December.
Thanks,
Guillaume
Powered by blists - more mailing lists