[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <130bc5f98c2fd501d32024d267ea73f1fb9d88b6.camel@perches.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:51:26 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: Convert S_<FOO> permission uses to octal
On Fri, 2021-02-12 at 16:01 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> writes:
>
> > Convert S_<FOO> permissions to the more readable octal.
> >
> > Done using:
> > $ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -f --fix-inplace --types=SYMBOLIC_PERMS fs/proc/*.[ch]
> >
> > No difference in generated .o files allyesconfig x86-64
> >
> > Link:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFw5v23T-zvDZp-MmD_EYxF8WbafwwB59934FV7g21uMGQ@mail.gmail.com/
>
>
> I will be frank. I don't know what 0644 means. I can never remember
> which bit is read, write or execute. So I like symbolic constants.
>
> I don't see a compelling reason to change the existing code.
Did you read Linus' message in the Link: above?
It was a reply to what Ingo Molnar suggested here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20160803081140.GA7833@gmail.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists