lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 12 Feb 2021 18:52:34 -0500
From:   Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
To:     Philipp Zabel <pza@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@...fresne.ca>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@...labora.com>,
        Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        linux-media <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG REPORT] media: coda: mpeg4 decode corruption on i.MX6qp only

Philipp, Fabio,

I was able to verify that the PREs do indeed overrun their allocated ocram area.

Section 38.5.1 of the iMX6QuadPlus manual indicates the ocram size
required: width(pixels) x 8 lines x 4 bytes. For 2048 pixels max, this
comes to 64K. This is what the PRE driver allocates. So far, so good.

The trouble starts when we're displaying a section of a much wider
bitmap. This happens in X when using two displays. e.g.:
HDMI 1920x1088
LVDS 1280x800
X bitmap 3200x1088, left side displayed on HDMI, right side on LVDS.

In such a case, the stride will be much larger than the width of a
display scanline.

This is where things start to go very wrong.

I found that the ocram area used by the PREs increases with the
stride. I experimentally found a formula:
ocam_used = display_widthx8x4 + (bitmap_width-display_width)x7x4

As the stride increases, the PRE eventually overruns the ocram and...
ends up in the "ocram aliased" area, where it overwrites the ocram in
use by the vpu/coda !

I could not find any PRE register setting that changes the used ocram area.

Sven

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ