linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] vfs: Disallow copy_file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANMq1KDBiPN3mE4vQ=DJc-YirPm_OP9wDfeacuKZHMLhhEYj+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:24:51 +0800
From:   Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
To:     "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
Cc:     Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Ian Lance Taylor <iant@...gle.com>,
        Luis Lozano <llozano@...omium.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] vfs: Disallow copy_file_range on generated file systems

On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 12:59 PM Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 08:53:47PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 12:44:05PM +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> > > copy_file_range (which calls generic_copy_file_checks) uses the
> > > inode file size to adjust the copy count parameter. This breaks
> > > with special filesystems like procfs/sysfs/debugfs/tracefs, where
> > > the file size appears to be zero, but content is actually returned
> > > when a read operation is performed. Other issues would also
> > > happen on partial writes, as the function would attempt to seek
> > > in the input file.
> > >
> > > Use the newly introduced FS_GENERATED_CONTENT filesystem flag
> > > to return -EOPNOTSUPP: applications can then retry with a more
> > > usual read/write based file copy (the fallback code is usually
> > > already present to handle older kernels).
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
> > > ---
> > >
> > >  fs/read_write.c | 3 +++
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
> > > index 0029ff2b0ca8..80322e89fb0a 100644
> > > --- a/fs/read_write.c
> > > +++ b/fs/read_write.c
> > > @@ -1485,6 +1485,9 @@ ssize_t vfs_copy_file_range(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
> > >     if (flags != 0)
> > >             return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > +   if (file_inode(file_in)->i_sb->s_type->fs_flags & FS_GENERATED_CONTENT)
> > > +           return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >
> > Why not declare a dummy copy_file_range_nop function that returns
> > EOPNOTSUPP and point all of these filesystems at it?
> >
> > (Or, I guess in these days where function pointers are the enemy,
> > create a #define that is a cast of 0x1, and fix do_copy_file_range to
> > return EOPNOTSUPP if it sees that?)

I was pondering abusing ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP) for this purpose ,-P

>
> Oh, I see, because that doesn't help if the source file is procfs and
> the dest file is (say) xfs, because the generic version will try to do
> splice magic and *poof*.

Yep. I mean, we could still add a check if the
file_in->f_op->copy_file_range == copy_file_range_nop in
do_copy_file_range...
But then we'd need to sprinkle .copy_file_range = copy_file_range_nop
in many many places (~700 as a lower bound[1]), since the file
operation structure is defined at the file level, not at the FS level,
and people are likely to forget...

[1]
$ git grep "struct file_operations.*=" | grep debug | wc -l
631
$ git grep "struct file_operations.*=" | grep trace | wc -l
84

>
> I guess the other nit thatI can think of at this late hour is ... what
> about the other virtual filesystems like configfs and whatnot?  Should
> we have a way to flag them as "this can't be the source of a CFR
> request" as well?
>
> Or is it just trace/debug/proc/sysfs that have these "zero size but
> readable" speshul behaviors?

I did try to audit the other filesystems. The ones I spotted:
 - devpts should be fine (only device nodes in there)
 - I think pstore doesn't need the flag as it's RAM-backed and persistent.

But yes, I missed configfs, thanks for catching that. I think we need
to add the flag for that one (looks like the sizes are all 4K).

>
> --D
>
> >
> > --D
> >
> > > +
> > >     ret = generic_copy_file_checks(file_in, pos_in, file_out, pos_out, &len,
> > >                                    flags);
> > >     if (unlikely(ret))
> > > --
> > > 2.30.0.478.g8a0d178c01-goog
> > >