[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210212090926.ox763j3btrqfzzzj@vireshk-i7>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:39:26 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Pritthijit Nath <pritthijit.nath@...oud.com>
Cc: vireshk@...nel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, johan@...nel.org,
elder@...nel.org, greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: greybus: Fixed alignment issue in hid.c
On 12-02-21, 13:48, Pritthijit Nath wrote:
> This change fixes a checkpatch CHECK style issue for "Alignment should match
> open parenthesis".
>
> Signed-off-by: Pritthijit Nath <pritthijit.nath@...oud.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/greybus/hid.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/hid.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/hid.c
> index ed706f39e87a..a56c3fb5d35a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/hid.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/hid.c
> @@ -221,8 +221,8 @@ static void gb_hid_init_reports(struct gb_hid *ghid)
> }
>
> static int __gb_hid_get_raw_report(struct hid_device *hid,
> - unsigned char report_number, __u8 *buf, size_t count,
> - unsigned char report_type)
> + unsigned char report_number, __u8 *buf, size_t count,
> + unsigned char report_type)
> {
> struct gb_hid *ghid = hid->driver_data;
> int ret;
I can't even count the number of attempts we have seen in previous
years to make checkpatch --strict happy for greybus.
I say we make this change once and for all across greybus, so we don't
have to review or NAK someone afterwards.
Should I send a patch for this ?
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists