[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18570ba4-0157-d20d-5371-c0f223d33d4d@metux.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:19:11 +0100
From: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <info@...ux.net>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <info@...ux.net>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: base: improve error message in
of_phandle_iterator_next()
On 11.02.21 21:13, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 10:58 AM Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
> <info@...ux.net> wrote:
>>
>> Also print out the phandle ID on error message, as a debug aid.
>
> I already have this patch applied in my tree. Why do you keep sending it?
Sorry, didn't know that when sending it the 2nd time, missed your last
mail in the mail flood :o
Seems my mail sorting rules are still quite imperfect. I suspect I'm not
the only one with those problems - how do you folks handle that ?
--mtx
--
--
---
Hinweis: unverschlüsselte E-Mails können leicht abgehört und manipuliert
werden ! Für eine vertrauliche Kommunikation senden Sie bitte ihren
GPG/PGP-Schlüssel zu.
---
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Free software and Linux embedded engineering
info@...ux.net -- +49-151-27565287
Powered by blists - more mailing lists