lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18570ba4-0157-d20d-5371-c0f223d33d4d@metux.net>
Date:   Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:19:11 +0100
From:   "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <info@...ux.net>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <info@...ux.net>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: base: improve error message in
 of_phandle_iterator_next()

On 11.02.21 21:13, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 10:58 AM Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
> <info@...ux.net> wrote:
>>
>> Also print out the phandle ID on error message, as a debug aid.
> 
> I already have this patch applied in my tree. Why do you keep sending it?

Sorry, didn't know that when sending it the 2nd time, missed your last
mail in the mail flood :o

Seems my mail sorting rules are still quite imperfect. I suspect I'm not
the only one with those problems - how do you folks handle that ?


--mtx

-- 
-- 
---
Hinweis: unverschlüsselte E-Mails können leicht abgehört und manipuliert
werden ! Für eine vertrauliche Kommunikation senden Sie bitte ihren
GPG/PGP-Schlüssel zu.
---
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Free software and Linux embedded engineering
info@...ux.net -- +49-151-27565287

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ