[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210212105853.GF15601@shuo-intel.sh.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 18:58:53 +0800
From: Shuo A Liu <shuo.a.liu@...el.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virt: acrn: Fix vCPU removing code build error
Hi Greg,
On Fri 12.Feb'21 at 8:52:33 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 12:57:24PM +0800, shuo.a.liu@...el.com wrote:
>> From: Shuo Liu <shuo.a.liu@...el.com>
>>
>> vCPU removing code depends on CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU as it uses remove_cpu()
>> and add_cpu(). Make the vCPU removing interface building with
>> CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU.
>>
>> ../drivers/virt/acrn/hsm.c: In function ‘remove_cpu_store’:
>> ../drivers/virt/acrn/hsm.c:389:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘remove_cpu’; [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> remove_cpu(cpu);
>>
>> ../drivers/virt/acrn/hsm.c:402:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘add_cpu’; [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>> add_cpu(cpu);
>>
>> Fixes: 279dcf693ac7 ("virt: acrn: Introduce an interface for Service VM to control vCPU")
>> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
>> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> # build-tested
>> Signed-off-by: Shuo Liu <shuo.a.liu@...el.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/virt/acrn/hsm.c | 4 ++++
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/virt/acrn/hsm.c b/drivers/virt/acrn/hsm.c
>> index 1f6b7c54a1a4..e340788aacdf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/virt/acrn/hsm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/virt/acrn/hsm.c
>> @@ -372,6 +372,7 @@ static int acrn_dev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
>> static ssize_t remove_cpu_store(struct device *dev,
>> struct device_attribute *attr,
>> const char *buf, size_t count)
>> @@ -403,9 +404,12 @@ static ssize_t remove_cpu_store(struct device *dev,
>> return ret;
>> }
>> static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(remove_cpu);
>> +#endif
>>
>> static struct attribute *acrn_attrs[] = {
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
>> &dev_attr_remove_cpu.attr,
>> +#endif
>> NULL
>> };
>>
>>
>
>Shouldn't the real solution for this be that remove_cpu() and add_cpu()
>have function prototypes for when this is not enabled in the kernel
>build?
Something like this in linux/cpu.h?
diff --git a/include/linux/cpu.h b/include/linux/cpu.h
index 3aaa0687e8df..94a578a96202 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpu.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpu.h
@@ -108,6 +108,8 @@ static inline void cpu_maps_update_done(void)
{
}
+static inline int add_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { return 0;}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
extern struct bus_type cpu_subsys;
@@ -137,6 +139,7 @@ static inline int cpus_read_trylock(void) { return
true; }
static inline void lockdep_assert_cpus_held(void) { }
static inline void cpu_hotplug_disable(void) { }
static inline void cpu_hotplug_enable(void) { }
+static inline int remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { return -EPERM; }
static inline void smp_shutdown_nonboot_cpus(unsigned int primary_cpu)
{ }
#endif /* !CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
>
>Putting #ifdef in .c files like this is not a good idea at all.
>
>Then, at runtime, you can determine if you need to create this sysfs
>file or not, as you do not want to expose it to userspace if the kernel
>can not handle it, right?
Right. I don't want to expose the sysfs to userspace if the kernel built
w/o CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU. But how to implement that if #ifdef is not used?
misc_register() creates sysfs with .groups (acrn_attr_groups)
unconditionally, then userspace can see the interface even it doesn't
work.
Thanks
shuo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists