[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YCZrNIecWpZGvbaw@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:49:08 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@...cle.com>,
=?utf-8?Q?Micka=C3=ABl_Sala=C3=BCn?=
<mic@...ikod.net>, dwmw2@...radead.org,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, masahiroy@...nel.org,
michal.lkml@...kovi.net, jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com,
ardb@...nel.org, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
lszubowi@...hat.com, javierm@...hat.com, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: Re: Conflict with Mickaël Salaün's blacklist patches [was [PATCH v5 0/4] Add EFI_CERT_X509_GUID support for dbx/mokx entries]
On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 01:14:06PM +0000, David Howells wrote:
>
> Hi Eric, Mickaël,
>
> Do we have a consensus on this? From what's written here, I don't think I can
> ask Linus to pull the merge of your two branches. I feel that I probably need
> to push Eric's first as that fixes a CVE if I can't offer a merge.
>
> David
Would it be possible to compose a single unified patch set?
It's also somewhat distracting to review both separately.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists