[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210212122521.GA90839@lothringen>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:25:21 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] nohz: change signal tick dependency to wakeup CPUs
of member tasks
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 05:21:36PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Rather than waking up all nohz_full CPUs on the system, only wakeup
> the target CPUs of member threads of the signal.
>
> Reduces interruptions to nohz_full CPUs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
>
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> @@ -444,9 +444,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tick_nohz_dep_clear_ta
> * Set a per-taskgroup tick dependency. Posix CPU timers need this in order to elapse
> * per process timers.
> */
> -void tick_nohz_dep_set_signal(struct signal_struct *sig, enum tick_dep_bits
> bit)
Why not keeping the signal struct as a parameter?
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists