[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210212135630.GF6057@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:56:30 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
Cc: "agross@...nel.org" <agross@...nel.org>,
"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
"jiangshanlai@...il.com" <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-power <linux-power@...rohmeurope.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"bjorn.andersson@...aro.org" <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
"lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/7] regulator: IRQ based event/error notification
helpers
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 09:33:44AM +0000, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> There seems to be few drivers which need delayed wq and which implement
> .remove() just to call the cancel_delayed_work_sync().
> I think this might help cleaning up those(?) Or am I completely off
> here?
I can see it being useful, yes.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists