linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ACPI: property: Refactor acpi_data_prop_read

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 12 Feb 2021 18:24:28 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] ACPI: property: Refactor acpi_data_prop_read_single()

On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 6:11 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 5:01 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 03:31:24PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 3:14 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

...

> > > > +       if (ret)
> > > > +               return ret;
> > >
> > > else if (!val)
> > >         ret = 1;
> >
> > But then it become a bug again :-)
>
> I'm not sure why?  The checks below will still happen and they may
> cause an error to be returned.

Oh, I misinterpreted ret = as plain return. Right. Seems okay.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko