linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] mm: compaction: update the COMPACT[STALL|FAIL] events properly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9d12dc04-9cf0-8dd1-5fb3-9a5f8e34d23f@suse.cz>
Date:   Fri, 12 Feb 2021 18:38:13 +0100
From:   Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To:     Charan Teja Reddy <charante@...eaurora.org>,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rientjes@...gle.com, linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc:     vinmenon@...eaurora.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] mm: compaction: update the COMPACT[STALL|FAIL] events
 properly

On 2/12/21 6:33 PM, Charan Teja Reddy wrote:
> By definition, COMPACT[STALL|FAIL] events needs to be counted when there
> is 'At least in one zone compaction wasn't deferred or skipped from the
> direct compaction'. And when compaction is skipped or deferred,
> COMPACT_SKIPPED will be returned but it will still go and update these
> compaction events which is wrong in the sense that COMPACT[STALL|FAIL]
> is counted without even trying the compaction.
> 
> Correct this by skipping the counting of these events when
> COMPACT_SKIPPED is returned for compaction. This indirectly also avoid
> the unnecessary try into the get_page_from_freelist() when compaction is
> not even tried.
> 
> There is a corner case where compaction is skipped but still count
> COMPACTSTALL event, which is that IRQ came and freed the page and the
> same is captured in capture_control.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Charan Teja Reddy <charante@...eaurora.org>

Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Thanks!

> ---
> 
> changes in V1: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1373665/
> 
>  mm/compaction.c | 8 ++++++++
>  mm/page_alloc.c | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/compaction.c b/mm/compaction.c
> index 190ccda..104ebef 100644
> --- a/mm/compaction.c
> +++ b/mm/compaction.c
> @@ -2487,6 +2487,14 @@ static enum compact_result compact_zone_order(struct zone *zone, int order,
>  	 */
>  	WRITE_ONCE(current->capture_control, NULL);
>  	*capture = READ_ONCE(capc.page);
> +	/*
> +	 * Technically, it is also possible that compaction is skipped but
> +	 * the page is still captured out of luck(IRQ came and freed the page).
> +	 * Returning COMPACT_SUCCESS in such cases helps in properly accounting
> +	 * the COMPACT[STALL|FAIL] when compaction is skipped.
> +	 */
> +	if (*capture)
> +		ret = COMPACT_SUCCESS;
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 519a60d..531f244 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -4152,6 +4152,8 @@ __alloc_pages_direct_compact(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
>  	memalloc_noreclaim_restore(noreclaim_flag);
>  	psi_memstall_leave(&pflags);
>  
> +	if (*compact_result == COMPACT_SKIPPED)
> +		return NULL;
>  	/*
>  	 * At least in one zone compaction wasn't deferred or skipped, so let's
>  	 * count a compaction stall
>