lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 12 Feb 2021 19:25:13 -0800
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To:     Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>, cang@...eaurora.org,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@...sung.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Satya Tangirala <satyat@...gle.com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/1] scsi: ufs: Enable power management for wlun

On 2/11/21 11:18 AM, Asutosh Das wrote:
> +static inline bool is_rpmb_wlun(struct scsi_device *sdev)
> +{
> +	return (sdev->lun == ufshcd_upiu_wlun_to_scsi_wlun(UFS_UPIU_RPMB_WLUN));
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool is_device_wlun(struct scsi_device *sdev)
> +{
> +	return (sdev->lun ==
> +		ufshcd_upiu_wlun_to_scsi_wlun(UFS_UPIU_UFS_DEVICE_WLUN));
> +}

A minor comment: checkpatch should have reported that "return is not a
function" for the above code.

>  /**
> + * ufshcd_setup_links - associate link b/w device wlun and other luns
> + * @sdev: pointer to SCSI device
> + * @hba: pointer to ufs hba
> + *
> + * Returns void
> + */

Please leave out "Returns void".

> +static int ufshcd_wl_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(dev);
> +	struct ufs_hba *hba;
> +	int ret;
> +	ktime_t start = ktime_get();
> +
> +	if (is_rpmb_wlun(sdev))
> +		return 0;
> +	hba = shost_priv(sdev->host);
> +	ret = __ufshcd_wl_suspend(hba, UFS_SYSTEM_PM);
> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_err(&sdev->sdev_gendev, "%s failed: %d\n", __func__,  ret);
> +
> +	trace_ufshcd_wl_suspend(dev_name(dev), ret,
> +		ktime_to_us(ktime_sub(ktime_get(), start)),
> +		hba->curr_dev_pwr_mode, hba->uic_link_state);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +
> +}

Please remove the blank line after the return statement.

Otherwise this patch looks good to me. Hence:

Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists