[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <29fcd3c1-72c7-1191-ec03-aea1b0c6b8c9@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 19:25:13 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>, cang@...eaurora.org,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@...sung.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Satya Tangirala <satyat@...gle.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/1] scsi: ufs: Enable power management for wlun
On 2/11/21 11:18 AM, Asutosh Das wrote:
> +static inline bool is_rpmb_wlun(struct scsi_device *sdev)
> +{
> + return (sdev->lun == ufshcd_upiu_wlun_to_scsi_wlun(UFS_UPIU_RPMB_WLUN));
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool is_device_wlun(struct scsi_device *sdev)
> +{
> + return (sdev->lun ==
> + ufshcd_upiu_wlun_to_scsi_wlun(UFS_UPIU_UFS_DEVICE_WLUN));
> +}
A minor comment: checkpatch should have reported that "return is not a
function" for the above code.
> /**
> + * ufshcd_setup_links - associate link b/w device wlun and other luns
> + * @sdev: pointer to SCSI device
> + * @hba: pointer to ufs hba
> + *
> + * Returns void
> + */
Please leave out "Returns void".
> +static int ufshcd_wl_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(dev);
> + struct ufs_hba *hba;
> + int ret;
> + ktime_t start = ktime_get();
> +
> + if (is_rpmb_wlun(sdev))
> + return 0;
> + hba = shost_priv(sdev->host);
> + ret = __ufshcd_wl_suspend(hba, UFS_SYSTEM_PM);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(&sdev->sdev_gendev, "%s failed: %d\n", __func__, ret);
> +
> + trace_ufshcd_wl_suspend(dev_name(dev), ret,
> + ktime_to_us(ktime_sub(ktime_get(), start)),
> + hba->curr_dev_pwr_mode, hba->uic_link_state);
> +
> + return ret;
> +
> +}
Please remove the blank line after the return statement.
Otherwise this patch looks good to me. Hence:
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists