linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210215091731.3773315b@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Mon, 15 Feb 2021 09:17:31 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
Cc:     David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@....com>,
        Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the btrfs tree

Hi all,

On Tue, 2 Feb 2021 13:45:59 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   dffd1df2d29a ("iomap: support REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND")
> 
> from the btrfs tree and commit:
> 
>   3e1a88ec9625 ("bio: add a helper calculating nr segments to alloc")
> 
> from the block tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> diff --cc fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> index e4c258a2cefc,ea1e8f696076..000000000000
> --- a/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/direct-io.c
> @@@ -292,13 -260,7 +289,14 @@@ iomap_dio_bio_actor(struct inode *inode
>   			iomap_dio_zero(dio, iomap, pos - pad, pad);
>   	}
>   
>  +	/*
>  +	 * Set the operation flags early so that bio_iov_iter_get_pages
>  +	 * can set up the page vector appropriately for a ZONE_APPEND
>  +	 * operation.
>  +	 */
>  +	bio_opf = iomap_dio_bio_opflags(dio, iomap, use_fua);
>  +
> + 	nr_pages = bio_iov_vecs_to_alloc(dio->submit.iter, BIO_MAX_PAGES);
>   	do {
>   		size_t n;
>   		if (dio->error) {

With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this
conflict still exists.

The btrfs tree commit is now

  c3b0e880bbfa ("iomap: support REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND")

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped