[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210215.125733.311587463365048945.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 12:57:33 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dan.carpenter@...cle.com
Cc: sgoutham@...vell.com, cjacob@...vell.com, gakula@...vell.com,
sbhatta@...vell.com, hkelam@...vell.com, kuba@...nel.org,
jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] octeontx2-pf: fix an off by one bug in
otx2_get_fecparam()
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 18:56:46 +0300
> The "<= FEC_MAX_INDEX" comparison should be "< FEC_MAX_INDEX".
>
> I did some cleanup in this function to hopefully make the code a bit
> clearer. There was no blank line after the declaration block. The
> closing curly brace on the fec[] declaration normally goes on a line
> by itself. And I removed the FEC_MAX_INDEX define and used
> ARRAY_SIZE(fec) instead.
>
> Fixes: d0cf9503e908 ("octeontx2-pf: ethtool fec mode support")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
This doesn't apply to net-next.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists