[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YCpVcInGhe382jXf@shinobu>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 20:05:20 +0900
From: William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
a.fatoum@...gutronix.de, kamel.bouhara@...tlin.com,
gwendal@...omium.org, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
david@...hnology.com, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
syednwaris@...il.com, patrick.havelange@...ensium.com,
fabrice.gasnier@...com, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
alexandre.torgue@...com, o.rempel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 01/22] docs: counter: Consolidate Counter sysfs
attributes documentation
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 04:57:52PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 21:13:25 +0900
> William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Duplicate ABIs are not valid, so let's consolidate these sysfs
> > attributes into the main sysfs-bus-counter documentation file.
>
> This is sensible to do, but is there any duplicate ABI? I went
> looking for any resulting build problems and couldn't see what was
> actually duplicated.
>
> Jonathan
There's no duplication currently, so this is just a preventative
measure. These files were started for the purpose of permitting future
duplication; now that duplication is explicitly disallowed, we're better
off consolidating these now in order to prevent fragmentation of the
documentation.
William Breathitt Gray
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists