[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMty3ZAgKPXpkiWuG3cGFs4sZPd182hBNaTbveL9USLj8o=ZxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 16:55:36 +0530
From: Jagan Teki <jagan@...rulasolutions.com>
To: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-amarula <linux-amarula@...rulasolutions.com>,
Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: display: bridge: Add bindings for SN65DSI83/84/85
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 2:32 PM Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 14/02/2021 18:44, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > SN65DSI83/84/85 devices are MIPI DSI to LVDS based bridge
> > controller IC's from Texas Instruments.
> >
> > SN65DSI83 - Single Channel DSI to Single-link LVDS bridge
> > SN65DSI84 - Single Channel DSI to Dual-link LVDS bridge
> > SN65DSI85 - Dual Channel DSI to Dual-link LVDS bridge
> >
> > Right now the bridge driver is supporting Channel A with single
> > link, so dt-bindings documented according to it.
>
> Shouldn't it describe Dual-link LVDS already for SN65DSI84/85 and Dual Channel DSI for SN65DSI85 even if not implemented in the driver ?
Patch documented only Single link LVDS as it only supported by driver.
Single link LVDS with Channel A configuration is common across all 3
variant chips. I have SN65DSI84 with Single link LVDS which is routed
in Channel A. Idea is to go with Single link and add double link later
and document the same.
Jagan.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists