linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] block: recalculate segment count for multi-segment discards correctly

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 15 Feb 2021 12:11:54 +0800
From:   Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
To:     David Jeffery <djeffery@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: recalculate segment count for multi-segment
 discards correctly

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 10:48 PM David Jeffery <djeffery@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> When a stacked block device inserts a request into another block device
> using blk_insert_cloned_request, the request's nr_phys_segments field gets
> recalculated by a call to blk_recalc_rq_segments in
> blk_cloned_rq_check_limits. But blk_recalc_rq_segments does not know how to
> handle multi-segment discards. For disk types which can handle
> multi-segment discards like nvme, this results in discard requests which
> claim a single segment when it should report several, triggering a warning
> in nvme and causing nvme to fail the discard from the invalid state.
>
>  WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 191 at drivers/nvme/host/core.c:700 nvme_setup_discard+0x170/0x1e0 [nvme_core]
>  ...
>  nvme_setup_cmd+0x217/0x270 [nvme_core]
>  nvme_loop_queue_rq+0x51/0x1b0 [nvme_loop]
>  __blk_mq_try_issue_directly+0xe7/0x1b0
>  blk_mq_request_issue_directly+0x41/0x70
>  ? blk_account_io_start+0x40/0x50
>  dm_mq_queue_rq+0x200/0x3e0
>  blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x10a/0x7d0
>  ? __sbitmap_queue_get+0x25/0x90
>  ? elv_rb_del+0x1f/0x30
>  ? deadline_remove_request+0x55/0xb0
>  ? dd_dispatch_request+0x181/0x210
>  __blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched+0x144/0x290
>  ? bio_attempt_discard_merge+0x134/0x1f0
>  __blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x129/0x180
>  blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x30/0x60
>  __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x47/0xe0
>  __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue+0x15b/0x170
>  blk_mq_sched_insert_requests+0x68/0xe0
>  blk_mq_flush_plug_list+0xf0/0x170
>  blk_finish_plug+0x36/0x50
>  xlog_cil_committed+0x19f/0x290 [xfs]
>  xlog_cil_process_committed+0x57/0x80 [xfs]
>  xlog_state_do_callback+0x1e0/0x2a0 [xfs]
>  xlog_ioend_work+0x2f/0x80 [xfs]
>  process_one_work+0x1b6/0x350
>  worker_thread+0x53/0x3e0
>  ? process_one_work+0x350/0x350
>  kthread+0x11b/0x140
>  ? __kthread_bind_mask+0x60/0x60
>  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
>
> This patch fixes blk_recalc_rq_segments to be aware of devices which can
> have multi-segment discards. It calculates the correct discard segment
> count by counting the number of bio as each discard bio is considered its
> own segment.
>
> Fixes: 1e739730c5b9 ("block: optionally merge discontiguous discard bios into a single request")
> Signed-off-by: David Jeffery <djeffery@...hat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Laurence Oberman <loberman@...hat.com>
>
> ---
> V2 explicitly returns 1 instead of falling through in the no-multi case and
> handles REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE like REQ_OP_DISCARD.
>
>  block/blk-merge.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
> index 808768f6b174..756473295f19 100644
> --- a/block/blk-merge.c
> +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
> @@ -383,6 +383,14 @@ unsigned int blk_recalc_rq_segments(struct request *rq)
>         switch (bio_op(rq->bio)) {
>         case REQ_OP_DISCARD:
>         case REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE:
> +               if (queue_max_discard_segments(rq->q) > 1) {
> +                       struct bio *bio = rq->bio;
> +
> +                       for_each_bio(bio)
> +                               nr_phys_segs++;
> +                       return nr_phys_segs;
> +               }
> +               return 1;
>         case REQ_OP_WRITE_ZEROES:
>                 return 0;
>         case REQ_OP_WRITE_SAME:
>

Hello Jens,

Any chance to merge this patch which fixes one regression caused
by commit 1e739730c5b9?

-- 
Ming Lei