[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <78e7d7fd8ac7a78e0c3c39c0e80cee4351a690f0.camel@fi.rohmeurope.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 13:12:16 +0000
From: "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
To: "hdegoede@...hat.com" <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: "agross@...nel.org" <agross@...nel.org>,
"myungjoo.ham@...sung.com" <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
"linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>,
"cw00.choi@...sung.com" <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
"wim@...ux-watchdog.org" <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"sre@...nel.org" <sre@...nel.org>,
"jroedel@...e.de" <jroedel@...e.de>,
"jdelvare@...e.com" <jdelvare@...e.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mgross@...ux.intel.com" <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
"bjorn.andersson@...aro.org" <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
"lgirdwood@...il.com" <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
"linux@...ck-us.net" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
"platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org"
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
"wens@...e.org" <wens@...e.org>,
"saravanak@...gle.com" <saravanak@...gle.com>,
"heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com" <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
"bgolaszewski@...libre.com" <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"rafael@...nel.org" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
"andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com"
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
"broonie@...nel.org" <broonie@...nel.org>,
"dan.j.williams@...el.com" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/7] drivers: base: Add resource managed version of
delayed work init
On Mon, 2021-02-15 at 12:43 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2/15/21 12:31 PM, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 11:37:26AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 2/15/21 8:22 AM, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2021-02-13 at 16:59 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2/13/21 4:27 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > > > > On 2/13/21 7:03 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > > > > > [ ... ]
> > > > > > > I think something like this should work:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > static int devm_delayed_work_autocancel(struct device
> > > > > > > *dev,
> > > > > > > struct delayed_work *w,
> > > > > > > void (*worker)(struct
> > > > > > > work_struct *work)) {
> > > > > > > INIT_DELAYED_WORK(w, worker);
> > > > > > > return devm_add_action(dev, (void (*action)(void
> > > > > > > *))cancel_delayed_work_sync, w);
> > > > > > > }
> > >
> > > include/linux/devm-cleanup-helpers.h
> > >
> > > And put everything (including kdoc texts) there.
> > >
> > > This way the functionality is 100% opt-in (by explicitly
> > > including
> > > the header if you want the helpers) which hopefully makes this a
> > > bit more acceptable to people who don't like this style of
> > > cleanups.
> > >
> > > I would be even happy to act as the upstream maintainer for such
> > > a
> > > include/linux/devm-cleanup-helpers.h file, I can maintain it as
> > > part
> > > of the platform-drivers-x86 tree (with its own MAINTAINERS
> > > entry).
> > >
> > > Greg, would this be an acceptable solution to you ?
> >
> > I don't know, sorry, let's revisit this after 5.12-rc1 is out, with
> > a
> > patch set that I can review again, and we can go from there as I
> > can't
> > do anything until then...
>
> Ok.
This is Ok for me too. I am in no hurry with this - I've already a few
things to work on.
So, I will rework this to be in a single header when v5.12-rc1 is out.
Best Regards
Matti Vaittinen
--
Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers
ROHM Semiconductors, Finland
SWDC
Kiviharjunlenkki 1E
90220 OULU
FINLAND
~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~
Simon says - in Latin please.
"non cogito me" dixit Rene Descarte, deinde evanescavit
(Thanks for the translation Simon)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists