[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5092d5ef-e790-3833-87be-e067c3189d25@leemhuis.info>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 06:25:46 +0100
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>,
Damian Tometzki <linux@...etzki.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: reporting-issues.rst: explain how to decode stack
traces
Am 11.02.21 um 18:07 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
> Just a couple of small nits (or one that is repeated):
:-D
> On 2/9/21 9:48 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>
>> - * If the failure includes a stack dump, like an Oops does, consider decoding
>> - it to find the offending line of code.
>> + * If your failure involves a 'panic', 'oops', or 'warning', consider decoding
>> + the kernel log to find the line of code that trigger the error.
> triggered
> […]
> or it could be "code that triggers"... (just not "trigger").
Ahh, yes, you're right of course. Went with the former, many thx for
taking a look and pointing it out!
Ciao, Thorsten
Powered by blists - more mailing lists