[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jGUgHsNaqLarf=YLwjtOe-mQB48LkOQLi7FcZyW1Qchg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 15:54:03 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Mark Pearson <markpearson@...ovo.com>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] platform/surface: Add platform profile driver for
Surface devices
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 3:36 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 2/11/21 9:16 PM, Maximilian Luz wrote:
> > This series adds a driver to provide platform profile support on 5th-
> > and later generation Microsoft Surface devices with a Surface System
> > Aggregator Module. On those devices, the platform profile can be used to
> > influence cooling behavior and power consumption.
> >
> > To achieve this, a new platform profile is introduced: the
> > 'balanced-performance' profile.
> >
> > In addition, a couple of fix-ups are performed:
> > - Hide CONFIG_ACPI_PLATFORM_PROFILE and change drivers so that it is
> > selected instead of depended on.
> > - Fix some references to documentation in a comment.
> >
> > Note: This series (or more specifically "platform/surface: Add platform
> > profile driver") depends on the "platform/surface: Add Surface
> > Aggregator device registry" series.
> >
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Introduce new 'balanced-performance' platform profile and change
> > profile mapping in driver.
> > - Perform some fix-ups for the ACPI platform profile implementation:
> > - Fix some references to documentation in a comment.
> > - Hide CONFIG_ACPI_PLATFORM_PROFILE
>
> Thanks, the entire series looks good to me, so for the series:
>
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
>
> Rafael, can you (once 5.12-rc1 is out) pick 1-3/4 and then provide a
> stable branch for me to merge?
Since [1-3/4] appear to be uncontroversial, so IMO it would be better
to merge them during the merge window, so they are present in
5.12-rc1.
The extra stable branch wouldn't be necessary in that case.
> Then I will pick up 4/4.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists