lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210215152716.540051184@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 15 Feb 2021 16:27:25 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
        Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 37/60] netfilter: conntrack: skip identical origin tuple in same zone only

From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>

[ Upstream commit 07998281c268592963e1cd623fe6ab0270b65ae4 ]

The origin skip check needs to re-test the zone. Else, we might skip
a colliding tuple in the reply direction.

This only occurs when using 'directional zones' where origin tuples
reside in different zones but the reply tuples share the same zone.

This causes the new conntrack entry to be dropped at confirmation time
because NAT clash resolution was elided.

Fixes: 4e35c1cb9460240 ("netfilter: nf_nat: skip nat clash resolution for same-origin entries")
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index 200cdad3ff3ab..9a40312b1f161 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -1091,7 +1091,8 @@ nf_conntrack_tuple_taken(const struct nf_conntrack_tuple *tuple,
 			 * Let nf_ct_resolve_clash() deal with this later.
 			 */
 			if (nf_ct_tuple_equal(&ignored_conntrack->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].tuple,
-					      &ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].tuple))
+					      &ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].tuple) &&
+					      nf_ct_zone_equal(ct, zone, IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL))
 				continue;
 
 			NF_CT_STAT_INC_ATOMIC(net, found);
-- 
2.27.0



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ