[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210215152720.711381389@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 16:26:51 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Lin Feng <linf@...gsu.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 038/104] bfq-iosched: Revert "bfq: Fix computation of shallow depth"
From: Lin Feng <linf@...gsu.com>
[ Upstream commit 388c705b95f23f317fa43e6abf9ff07b583b721a ]
This reverts commit 6d4d273588378c65915acaf7b2ee74e9dd9c130a.
bfq.limit_depth passes word_depths[] as shallow_depth down to sbitmap core
sbitmap_get_shallow, which uses just the number to limit the scan depth of
each bitmap word, formula:
scan_percentage_for_each_word = shallow_depth / (1 << sbimap->shift) * 100%
That means the comments's percentiles 50%, 75%, 18%, 37% of bfq are correct.
But after commit patch 'bfq: Fix computation of shallow depth', we use
sbitmap.depth instead, as a example in following case:
sbitmap.depth = 256, map_nr = 4, shift = 6; sbitmap_word.depth = 64.
The resulsts of computed bfqd->word_depths[] are {128, 192, 48, 96}, and
three of the numbers exceed core dirver's 'sbitmap_word.depth=64' limit
nothing.
Signed-off-by: Lin Feng <linf@...gsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
block/bfq-iosched.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index 9e4eb0fc1c16e..9e81d1052091f 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -6332,13 +6332,13 @@ static unsigned int bfq_update_depths(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
* limit 'something'.
*/
/* no more than 50% of tags for async I/O */
- bfqd->word_depths[0][0] = max(bt->sb.depth >> 1, 1U);
+ bfqd->word_depths[0][0] = max((1U << bt->sb.shift) >> 1, 1U);
/*
* no more than 75% of tags for sync writes (25% extra tags
* w.r.t. async I/O, to prevent async I/O from starving sync
* writes)
*/
- bfqd->word_depths[0][1] = max((bt->sb.depth * 3) >> 2, 1U);
+ bfqd->word_depths[0][1] = max(((1U << bt->sb.shift) * 3) >> 2, 1U);
/*
* In-word depths in case some bfq_queue is being weight-
@@ -6348,9 +6348,9 @@ static unsigned int bfq_update_depths(struct bfq_data *bfqd,
* shortage.
*/
/* no more than ~18% of tags for async I/O */
- bfqd->word_depths[1][0] = max((bt->sb.depth * 3) >> 4, 1U);
+ bfqd->word_depths[1][0] = max(((1U << bt->sb.shift) * 3) >> 4, 1U);
/* no more than ~37% of tags for sync writes (~20% extra tags) */
- bfqd->word_depths[1][1] = max((bt->sb.depth * 6) >> 4, 1U);
+ bfqd->word_depths[1][1] = max(((1U << bt->sb.shift) * 6) >> 4, 1U);
for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
for (j = 0; j < 2; j++)
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists