[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210215115231.2311310a@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 11:52:31 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Aya Levin <ayal@...dia.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@...lanox.com>,
Raed Salem <raeds@...dia.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got conflicts in:
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c
between commit:
e4484d9df500 ("net/mlx5e: Enable striding RQ for Connect-X IPsec capable devices")
from the net tree and commits:
224169d2a32b ("net/mlx5e: IPsec, Remove unnecessary config flag usage")
70038b73e40e ("net/mlx5e: Add listener to trap event")
214baf22870c ("net/mlx5e: Support HTB offload")
from the net-next tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
index a2e0b548bf57,d3534b657b98..000000000000
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
@@@ -65,7 -65,8 +65,9 @@@
#include "en/devlink.h"
#include "lib/mlx5.h"
#include "en/ptp.h"
+#include "fpga/ipsec.h"
+ #include "qos.h"
+ #include "en/trap.h"
bool mlx5e_check_fragmented_striding_rq_cap(struct mlx5_core_dev *mdev)
{
@@@ -2069,10 -2106,8 +2107,8 @@@ static void mlx5e_build_rq_frags_info(s
u32 buf_size = 0;
int i;
- #ifdef CONFIG_MLX5_EN_IPSEC
- if (MLX5_IPSEC_DEV(mdev))
+ if (mlx5_fpga_is_ipsec_device(mdev))
byte_count += MLX5E_METADATA_ETHER_LEN;
- #endif
if (mlx5e_rx_is_linear_skb(params, xsk)) {
int frag_stride;
diff --cc drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c
index 4864deed9dc9,4de5a97ceac6..000000000000
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c
@@@ -1794,12 -1786,10 +1786,10 @@@ int mlx5e_rq_set_handlers(struct mlx5e_
rq->dealloc_wqe = mlx5e_dealloc_rx_mpwqe;
rq->handle_rx_cqe = priv->profile->rx_handlers->handle_rx_cqe_mpwqe;
- #ifdef CONFIG_MLX5_EN_IPSEC
- if (MLX5_IPSEC_DEV(mdev)) {
- netdev_err(netdev, "MPWQE RQ with IPSec offload not supported\n");
+ if (mlx5_fpga_is_ipsec_device(mdev)) {
+ netdev_err(netdev, "MPWQE RQ with Innova IPSec offload not supported\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
- #endif
if (!rq->handle_rx_cqe) {
netdev_err(netdev, "RX handler of MPWQE RQ is not set\n");
return -EINVAL;
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists