[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YCqZR5N6ktABHXNf@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 17:54:47 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, hverkuil@...all.nl,
laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, mchehab@...nel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/3] lib/vsprintf: Add support for printing V4L2 and
DRM fourccs
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 03:56:50PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 03:31:29PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 01:40:28PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > Add a printk modifier %p4cc (for pixel format) for printing V4L2 and DRM
> > > pixel formats denoted by fourccs. The fourcc encoding is the same for both
> > > so the same implementation can be used.
> >
> > This version I almost like, feel free to add
> > Reviewed-by: From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > after considering addressing below nit-picks.
> > > +Examples::
> > > +
> > > + %p4cc BG12 little-endian (0x32314742)
> >
> > No examples with spaces / non-printable / non-ascii characters
>
> I can sure add an example that has a space. But do you think I really
> should add an example where invalid information is being printed?
I think you have to provide better coverage of what user can get out of this.
Perhaps one example with space and non-printable character is enough.
> > > + char output[sizeof("1234 little-endian (0x01234567)")];
> >
> > 1234 -> ABCD ? (Or XY12 to be closer to the reality)
>
> I count in numbers... albeit the hexadecimal number there starts from zero.
>
> I guess both would work though.
>
> 0123 would be consistent.
Since letters can be printed the above is confusing a bit. I think XY12 is
closer to the reality than 0123.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists