[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210215155806.bjcouvmkapj4pa4y@treble>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 09:58:06 -0600
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@...gyan1223.wang>,
"# 3.4.x" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip: objtool/urgent] objtool: Fix seg fault with Clang
non-section symbols
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 09:53:07AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Feb 2021 09:51:47 -0600
> Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > Steve, looks like recordmcount avoids referencing weak symbols directly
> > by their function symbol. Maybe it can just skip weak symbols which
> > don't have a section symbol, since this seems like a rare scenario.
>
> When does the .text.unlikely section disappear? During the creation of the
> object, or later in the linker stage?
The section is there, but the symbol associated with the section
(".text.unlikely" symbol) isn't generated by the assembler.
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists