linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/25] Apple M1 SoC platform bring-up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7c8bcf79-233b-7ea8-4fea-2fb29ca430ef@marcan.st>
Date:   Tue, 16 Feb 2021 00:57:27 +0900
From:   Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>
To:     gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        Mohamed Mediouni <mohamed.mediouni@...amail.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Stan Skowronek <stan@...ellium.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@...all.nl>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/25] Apple M1 SoC platform bring-up

On 15/02/2021 22.22, gregkh wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 01:57:39PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> (adding maintainers for the serial/irqchip/clocksource drivers and
>> arch/arm64 to cc)
>>
>> I would suggest merging it together as a series through the soc tree for
>> v5.13, once each patch has been reviewed by the respective subsystem
>> maintainers, with possible add-on patches on the same branch for
>> additional drivers that may become ready during the 5.12-rc cycle.
>> After the initial merge, driver patches will of course go through subsystem
>> trees as normal.
>>
>> Let me know if that works for everyone.
> 
> Sure, as long as the maintainers get to see the patches, I don't think
> I've seen the serial ones at all...

Sorry, I figured Krzysztof would take a look at it first and I didn't 
want to spam too much. I'm still getting used to figuring out who to CC...

Do you want to take a look at v2, or wait for v3?

-- 
Hector Martin (marcan@...can.st)
Public Key: https://mrcn.st/pub