linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] drm: Switch to %p4cc format modifier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YCqxDsCpjODcLhbp@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 Feb 2021 19:36:14 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, hverkuil@...all.nl,
        laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, mchehab@...nel.org,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] drm: Switch to %p4cc format modifier

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 07:26:55PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 03:41:14PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> ...
> > > +	seq_printf(m, "\t\tuapi: [FB:%d] ", fb ? fb->base.id : 0);
> > > +	if (fb)
> > > +		seq_printf(m, "%p4cc", &fb->format->format);
> > > +	else
> > > +		seq_puts(m, "n/a");
> > 
> > > +	seq_printf(m, ",0x%llx,%dx%d, visible=%s, src=" DRM_RECT_FP_FMT ", dst=" DRM_RECT_FMT ", rotation=%s\n",
> > 
> > Why not to keep two seq_printf() calls?
> > 
> > if (fb) {
> > 	seq_printf();
> > } else {
> > 	seq_printf();
> > }
> > 
> > ?
> 
> I could, but it'd repeat a lot of the same format string that is very
> complicated right now. Therefore I thought it's better to split.

It's fine, why not?

> Or do you mean seq_printf() vs. seq_puts()? checkpatch.pl (rightly) warns
> about it.

If it doesn't take run-time parameters, then definitely
if (fb)
	seq_printf();
else
	seq_puts();

> > >  		   fb ? fb->modifier : 0,
> > >  		   fb ? fb->width : 0, fb ? fb->height : 0,
> > >  		   plane_visibility(plane_state),

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko