Message-ID: <fc62409c-bc1f-58d5-4094-0ad07a5de58c@huawei.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 Feb 2021 18:00:52 +0000
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     "Viswas.G@...rochip.com" <Viswas.G@...rochip.com>,
        "jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "akshatzen@...gle.com" <akshatzen@...gle.com>,
        "Ruksar.devadi@...rochip.com" <Ruksar.devadi@...rochip.com>,
        "radha@...gle.com" <radha@...gle.com>,
        "bjashnani@...gle.com" <bjashnani@...gle.com>,
        "vishakhavc@...gle.com" <vishakhavc@...gle.com>,
        "jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com" <jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com>,
        "Ashokkumar.N@...rochip.com" <Ashokkumar.N@...rochip.com>
CC:     "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "hare@...e.de" <hare@...e.de>,
        "kashyap.desai@...adcom.com" <kashyap.desai@...adcom.com>,
        "ming.lei@...hat.com" <ming.lei@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] scsi: pm8001: Expose HW queues for pm80xx hw

Hi Viswas,

> 
> We could test this patch and it works fine. 

Good to know.

> Regarding the usage of request->tag, We have some challenges there. Pm80xx driver need tag for internal command as well.

> Tag is controller wide and we need to assign unique tag for internal command as well. 

This is not a problem unique to pm8001.

> If we use request->tag, how can we get tag for internal commands ? 

This same problem is currently solved for hisi_sas driver by reserving a 
small amount of tags for internal commands, which are managed by the driver.

For example, we support 4096 hostwide tags for hisi_sas. However we tell 
scsi midlayer that we support 4000 (in scsi_host.can_queue), and then 
use the other 96 for internal commands.

See scsi/hisi_sas/hisi_sas_main.c::hisi_sas_slot_index_alloc() and 
hisi_sas_slot_index_free() for how we maintain these tags.

Having said that, there was a series to allow the block layer manage 
these internal commands, but it is not merged yet:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20200703130122.111448-1-hare@suse.de/

Having this would mean that the driver no longer needs to manage these 
tags internally.

Thanks,
John

If driver allocate that, how can we make sure it will not conflict with 
the request->tag ?
> 
> Regards,
> Viswas G
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
>> Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 10:46 PM
>> To: Viswas G - I30667 <Viswas.G@...rochip.com>; jejb@...ux.ibm.com;
>> martin.petersen@...cle.com; akshatzen@...gle.com; Ruksar Devadi -
>> I52327 <Ruksar.devadi@...rochip.com>; radha@...gle.com;
>> bjashnani@...gle.com; vishakhavc@...gle.com;
>> jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com; Ashokkumar N - X53535
>> <Ashokkumar.N@...rochip.com>
>> Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; hare@...e.de;
>> kashyap.desai@...adcom.com; ming.lei@...hat.com
>> Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] scsi: pm8001: Expose HW queues for pm80xx
>> hw
>>
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
>> content is safe
>>
>> On 01/02/2021 17:08, Viswas.G@...rochip.com wrote:
>>> Hi John,
>>>
>>> AFAIK, there is no such restrictions. Any queue can be used for
>> internal/external commands.
>>>
>>
>> ok, understood.
>>
>> BTW, to see even more performance improvement, it would be good to use
>> request->tag for ccb tag, rather that the LLDD manage this itself. I
>> mentioned this perviously elsewhere. Do you plan to make that change?
>> hisi_sas and megaraid sas are examples of drivers who do this.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> John
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Viswas G
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
>>>> Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 4:53 PM
>>>> To: Viswas G - I30667 <Viswas.G@...rochip.com>; jejb@...ux.ibm.com;
>>>> martin.petersen@...cle.com; akshatzen@...gle.com; Ruksar Devadi -
>>>> I52327 <Ruksar.devadi@...rochip.com>; radha@...gle.com;
>>>> bjashnani@...gle.com; vishakhavc@...gle.com;
>>>> jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com; Ashokkumar N - X53535
>>>> <Ashokkumar.N@...rochip.com>
>>>> Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
>>>> hare@...e.de; kashyap.desai@...adcom.com; ming.lei@...hat.com
>>>> Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] scsi: pm8001: Expose HW queues for
>>>> pm80xx hw
>>>>
>>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
>>>> know the content is safe
>>>>
>>>> On 31/01/2021 07:19, Viswas.G@...rochip.com wrote:
>>>>> Thanks Johns.
>>>>>
>>>>> We could see a kernel crash while testing this patch.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for testing.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [  246.724632] scsi host10: pm80xx
>>>>> [  248.005258] sas: Enter sas_scsi_recover_host busy: 0 failed: 0 [
>>>>> 248.168973] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address:
>>>>> 0000000000000110 [  248.175926] #PF: supervisor read access in
>>>>> kernel mode [  248.181065] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present
>>>>> page [ 248.186196] PGD 0 P4D 0 [  248.188736] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
>>>>> PTI [  248.192230] CPU: 10 PID: 77 Comm: kworker/u26:2 Kdump: loaded
>>>> Tainted: G S         OE     5.11.0-rc3 #2
>>>>> [  248.201614] Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/X10DRi-LN4+,
>>>>> BIOS 3.1 06/08/2018 [  248.209258] Workqueue: events_unbound
>>>>> async_run_entry_fn [  248.214571] RIP:
>>>>> 0010:pm80xx_chip_sata_req+0x7f/0x5e0 [pm80xx] [  248.220413] Code:
>>>>> c1 7c c1 e9 03 4d 8b ac 24 80 01 00 00 48 c7 44 24 14 00 00 00 00 89
>>>>> 04
>>>>> 24 31 c0 48 c7 84 24 88 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f3 48 ab <48> 8b ba 10
>>>>> 01
>>>>> 00 00 e8 35 35 c6 ef c1 e8 10 89 44 24 04 0f b6 43 [  248.239157] RSP:
>>>>> 0018:ffffb98d834979f0 EFLAGS: 00010046 [  248.244384] RAX:
>>>>> 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff9523c321c000 RCX: 0000000000000000 [
>>>>> 248.251516] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff952450720048 RDI:
>>>>> ffffb98d83497a80 [  248.258641] RBP: ffff9523c7420000 R08:
>>>>> 0000000000000100 R09: 0000000000000001 [  248.265764] R10:
>>>>> 0000000000000001 R11: ffff9523c9e40000 R12: ffff9523ca1c3600 [
>>>>> 248.272887] R13: ffff9523c9e40000 R14: ffffb98d83497a04 R15:
>>>> ffff952450720048 [  248.280013] FS:  0000000000000000(0000)
>>>> GS:ffff9527afd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [  248.288090] CS:
>>>> 0010
>>>> DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [  248.293826] CR2:
>>>> 0000000000000110 CR3: 000000029ac10001 CR4: 00000000001706e0 [
>>>> 248.300952] Call Trace:
>>>>
>>>> I think that the problem here is that ata_queued_cmd->scmd is NULL
>>>> for the ata internal command.
>>>>
>>>> Please try this fix:
>>>>
>>>> ---->8-----
>>>>
>>>> @@ -4451,7 +4451,7 @@ static int pm80xx_chip_sata_req(struct
>>>> pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
>>>>           struct scsi_cmnd *scmd = qc->scsicmd;
>>>>           u32 tag = ccb->ccb_tag;
>>>>           int ret;
>>>> -       u32 q_index, blk_tag;
>>>> +       u32 q_index = 0, blk_tag;
>>>>           struct sata_start_req sata_cmd;
>>>>           u32 hdr_tag, ncg_tag = 0;
>>>>           u64 phys_addr, start_addr, end_addr; @@ -4463,8 +4463,10 @@
>>>> static int pm80xx_chip_sata_req(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
>>>>           u32 opc = OPC_INB_SATA_HOST_OPSTART;
>>>>           memset(&sata_cmd, 0, sizeof(sata_cmd));
>>>>
>>>> -       blk_tag = blk_mq_unique_tag(scmd->request);
>>>> -       q_index = blk_mq_unique_tag_to_hwq(blk_tag);
>>>> +       if (scmd) {
>>>> +               blk_tag = blk_mq_unique_tag(scmd->request);
>>>> +               q_index = blk_mq_unique_tag_to_hwq(blk_tag);
>>>> +       }
>>>>           circularQ = &pm8001_ha->inbnd_q_tbl[q_index];
>>>>
>>>> ----8<-----
>>>>
>>>> You may need similar for other dispatch paths also - like smp - but I
>>>> don't think that you will.
>>>>
>>>> BTW, do you know if there is actually a limitation on the HW that
>>>> queue
>>>> #0 is used for all "internal" IO (mpi), like phy control operation? Jack?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> John
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> [  248.303402]  pm8001_task_exec.isra.9+0x2a4/0x460 [pm80xx] [
>>>>> 248.308805]  sas_ata_qc_issue+0x187/0x220 [libsas] [  248.313607]
>>>>> ata_qc_issue+0x107/0x1e0 [libata] [  248.318069]
>>>>> ata_exec_internal_sg+0x2c8/0x580 [libata] [  248.323217]
>>>>> ata_exec_internal+0x5f/0x90 [libata] [  248.327931]
>>>>> ata_dev_read_id+0x306/0x480 [libata] [  248.332647]
>>>>> ata_eh_recover+0x7ea/0x12a0 [libata] [  248.337369]  ?
>>>>> vprintk_emit+0x114/0x220 [  248.341208]  ?
>>>>> sas_ata_sched_eh+0x60/0x60 [libsas] [  248.346002]  ?
>>>>> sas_ata_prereset+0x50/0x50 [libsas] [ 248.350795]  ? printk+0x58/0x6f [
>> 248.353941]  ?
>>>>> sas_ata_sched_eh+0x60/0x60 [libsas] [  248.358733]  ?
>>>>> sas_ata_prereset+0x50/0x50 [libsas] [  248.363525]
>>>>> ata_do_eh+0x40/0xb0 [libata] [  248.367556]
>>>>> ata_scsi_port_error_handler+0x354/0x770 [libata] [  248.373318]
>>>>> async_sas_ata_eh+0x44/0x7b [libsas] [  248.377938]
>>>>> async_run_entry_fn+0x39/0x160 [  248.382040]
>>>>> process_one_work+0x1cb/0x360 [  248.386050]
>>>> worker_thread+0x30/0x370
>>>>> [  248.389706]  ? processe_work+0x360/0x360 [  248.393884]
>>>>> kthread+0x116/0x130 [  248.397116]  ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80 [
>>>>> 248.400773]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 [  248.404355] Modules linked in:
>>>>> pm80xx(OE) libsas scsi_transport_sas xt_CHECKSUM xt_MASQUERADE
>>>>> xt_conntrack ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 nft_compat nft_counter
>>>> nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4
>>>> nf_tables nfnetlink tun bridge stp llc rfkill sunrpc vfat fat
>>>> intel_rapl_msr intel_rapl_common sb_edac x86_pkg_temp_thermal
>>>> intel_powerclamp coretemp kvm_intel kvm irqbypass joydev
>>>> crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel ipmi_ssif iTCO_wdt
>>>> iTCO_vendor_support mei_me rapl
>>>> i2c_i801 intel_cstate mei acpi_ipmi lpc_ich intel_uncore pcspkr
>>>> ipmi_si i2c_smbus ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler acpi_power_meter
>>>> acpi_pad ioatdma ip_tables xfs libcrc32c sr_mod sd_mod cdrom t10_pi
>>>> sg ast drm_vram_helper drm_kms_helper syscopyarea igb sysfillrect
>>>> sysimgblt fb_sys_fops drm_ttm_helper ttm ahci libahci dca drm
>>>> crc32c_intel libata i2c_algo_bit wmi dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log
>>>> dm_mod fuse [ 248.483431] CR2: 0000000000000110
>>>>> [    0.000000] Linux version 5.11.0-rc3 (root@...alhost.localdomain) (gcc
>>>> (GCC) 8.3.1 20191121 (Red Hat 8.3.1-5), GNU ld version 2.30-79.el8)
>>>> #2 SMP Mon Jan 25 23:56:12 IST 2021
>>>>> [    0.000000] Command line: elfcorehr=0x45000000
>>>> BOOT_IMAGE=(hd14,gpt2)/vmlinuz-5.11.0-rc3 ro
>>>> resume=/dev/mapper/rhel-swap rhgb console=ttyS1,115200 loglevel=7
>>>> irqpoll nr_cpus=1 reset_devices cgroup_disable=memory mce=off
>>>> numa=off
>>>> udev.children-max=2 panic=10 rootflags=nofail acpi_no_memhotplug
>>>> transparent_hugepage=never nokaslr novmcoredd hest_disable
>>>> disable_cpu_apicid=0
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2021 4:47 PM
>>>>>> To: jejb@...ux.ibm.com; martin.petersen@...cle.com;
>>>>>> akshatzen@...gle.com; Viswas G - I30667
>> <Viswas.G@...rochip.com>;
>>>>>> Ruksar Devadi - I52327 <Ruksar.devadi@...rochip.com>;
>>>>>> radha@...gle.com; bjashnani@...gle.com; vishakhavc@...gle.com;
>>>>>> jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com; Ashokkumar N - X53535
>>>>>> <Ashokkumar.N@...rochip.com>
>>>>>> Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
>>>>>> hare@...e.de; kashyap.desai@...adcom.com; ming.lei@...hat.com;
>>>> John
>>>>>> Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
>>>>>> Subject: [RFC/RFT PATCH] scsi: pm8001: Expose HW queues for pm80xx
>>>> hw
>>>>>>
>>>>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
>>>>>> know the content is safe
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In commit 05c6c029a44d ("scsi: pm80xx: Increase number of supported
>>>>>> queues"), support for 80xx chip was improved by enabling multiple
>>>>>> HW queues.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In this, like other SCSI MQ HBA drivers, the HW queues were not
>>>>>> exposed to upper layer, and instead the driver managed the queues
>>>> internally.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, this management duplicates blk-mq code. In addition, the
>>>>>> HW queue management is sub-optimal for a system where the number
>> of
>>>> CPUs
>>>>>> exceeds the HW queues - this is because queues are selected in a
>>>>>> round- robin fashion, when it would be better to make adjacent CPUs
>>>>>> submit on the same queue. And finally, the affinity of the
>>>>>> completion queue interrupts is not set to mirror the cpu<->HQ queue
>>>>>> mapping, which
>>>> is suboptimal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As such, for when MSIX is supported, expose HW queues to upper
>> layer.
>>>>>> Flag PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY is set for allocating the MSIX vectors to
>>>>>> automatically assign affinity for the completion queue interrupts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> I sent as an RFC/RFT as I have no HW to test. In addition, since HW
>>>>>> queue
>>>>>> #0 is used always for internal commands (like in
>>>>>> send_task_abort()), if all CPUs associated with HW queue #0 are
>>>>>> offlined, the interrupt for that queue will be shutdown, and no
>>>>>> CPUs would be available to service any internal commands
>>>>>> completion. To solve that, we need [0] merged first and switch over
>>>>>> to use the new API. But we can still test
>>>> performance in the meantime.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I assume someone else is making the change to use the request tag
>>>>>> for IO tag management.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/47ba045e-a490-198b-1744-
>>>>>> 529f97192d3b@...e.de/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
>>>>>> index ee2de177d0d0..73479803a23e 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c
>>>>>> @@ -81,6 +81,15 @@ LIST_HEAD(hba_list);
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     struct workqueue_struct *pm8001_wq;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +static int pm8001_map_queues(struct Scsi_Host *shost) {
>>>>>> +       struct sas_ha_struct *sha = SHOST_TO_SAS_HA(shost);
>>>>>> +       struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha = sha->lldd_ha;
>>>>>> +       struct blk_mq_queue_map *qmap =
>>>>>> +&shost->tag_set.map[HCTX_TYPE_DEFAULT];
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +       return blk_mq_pci_map_queues(qmap, pm8001_ha->pdev, 0); }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>>     /*
>>>>>>      * The main structure which LLDD must register for scsi core.
>>>>>>      */
>>>>>> @@ -106,6 +115,7 @@ static struct scsi_host_template pm8001_sht = {
>>>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
>>>>>>            .compat_ioctl           = sas_ioctl,
>>>>>>     #endif
>>>>>> +       .map_queues                     = pm8001_map_queues,
>>>>>>            .shost_attrs            = pm8001_host_attrs,
>>>>>>            .track_queue_depth      = 1,
>>>>>>     };
>>>>>> @@ -923,9 +933,8 @@ static int
>> pm8001_configure_phy_settings(struct
>>>>>> pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)  static u32 pm8001_setup_msix(struct
>>>>>> pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)  {
>>>>>>            u32 number_of_intr;
>>>>>> -       int rc, cpu_online_count;
>>>>>> +       int rc;
>>>>>>            unsigned int allocated_irq_vectors;
>>>>>> -
>>>>>>            /* SPCv controllers supports 64 msi-x */
>>>>>>            if (pm8001_ha->chip_id == chip_8001) {
>>>>>>                    number_of_intr = 1; @@ -933,16 +942,15 @@ static
>>>>>> u32 pm8001_setup_msix(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha)
>>>>>>                    number_of_intr = PM8001_MAX_MSIX_VEC;
>>>>>>            }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -       cpu_online_count = num_online_cpus();
>>>>>> -       number_of_intr = min_t(int, cpu_online_count, number_of_intr);
>>>>>> -       rc = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pm8001_ha->pdev, number_of_intr,
>>>>>> -                       number_of_intr, PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
>>>>>> +       /* Use default affinity descriptor, which spreads *all* vectors */
>>>>>> +       rc = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pm8001_ha->pdev, 1,
>>>>>> +                       number_of_intr, PCI_IRQ_MSIX |
>>>>>> + PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY);
>>>>>>            allocated_irq_vectors = rc;
>>>>>>            if (rc < 0)
>>>>>>                    return rc;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            /* Assigns the number of interrupts */
>>>>>> -       number_of_intr = min_t(int, allocated_irq_vectors,
>> number_of_intr);
>>>>>> +       number_of_intr = allocated_irq_vectors;
>>>>>>            pm8001_ha->number_of_intr = number_of_intr;
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            /* Maximum queue number updating in HBA structure */ @@
>>>>>> -1113,6
>>>>>> +1121,16 @@ static int pm8001_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>>>>>>            if (rc)
>>>>>>                    goto err_out_enable;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +       if (pm8001_ha->number_of_intr > 1) {
>>>>>> +               shost->nr_hw_queues = pm8001_ha->number_of_intr;
>>>>>> +               /*
>>>>>> +                * For now, ensure we're not sent too many commands
>>>>>> + by
>>>> setting
>>>>>> +                * host_tagset. This is also required if we start using request
>>>>>> +                * tag.
>>>>>> +                */
>>>>>> +               shost->host_tagset = 1;
>>>>>> +       }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>>            rc = scsi_add_host(shost, &pdev->dev);
>>>>>>            if (rc)
>>>>>>                    goto err_out_ha_free; diff --git
>>>>>> a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h
>>>>>> b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h
>>>>>> index f2c8cbad3853..74bc6fed693e 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h
>>>>>> @@ -55,6 +55,8 @@
>>>>>>     #include <scsi/scsi_tcq.h>
>>>>>>     #include <scsi/sas_ata.h>
>>>>>>     #include <linux/atomic.h>
>>>>>> +#include <linux/blk-mq.h>
>>>>>> +#include <linux/blk-mq-pci.h>
>>>>>>     #include "pm8001_defs.h"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>     #define DRV_NAME               "pm80xx"
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
>>>>>> b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
>>>>>> index 6772b0924dac..31d65ce91e7d 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm80xx_hwi.c
>>>>>> @@ -4299,12 +4299,13 @@ static int pm80xx_chip_ssp_io_req(struct
>>>>>> pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha,
>>>>>>            struct domain_device *dev = task->dev;
>>>>>>            struct pm8001_device *pm8001_dev = dev->lldd_dev;
>>>>>>            struct ssp_ini_io_start_req ssp_cmd;
>>>>>> +       struct scsi_cmnd *scmd = task->uldd_task;
>>>>>>            u32 tag = ccb->ccb_tag;
>>>>>>            int ret;
>>>>>>            u64 phys_addr, start_addr, end_addr;
>>>>>>            u32 end_addr_high, end_addr_low;
>>>>>>            struct inbound_queue_table *circularQ;
>>>>>> -       u32 q_index, cpu_id;
>>>>>> +       u32 blk_tag, q_index;
>>>>>>            u32 opc = OPC_INB_SSPINIIOSTART;
>>>>>>            memset(&ssp_cmd, 0, sizeof(ssp_cmd));
>>>>>>            memcpy(ssp_cmd.ssp_iu.lun, task->ssp_task.LUN, 8); @@
>>>>>> -4323,8
>>>>>> +4324,8 @@ static int pm80xx_chip_ssp_io_req(struct
>> pm8001_hba_info
>>>>>> *pm8001_ha,
>>>>>>            ssp_cmd.ssp_iu.efb_prio_attr |= (task->ssp_task.task_attr & 7);
>>>>>>            memcpy(ssp_cmd.ssp_iu.cdb, task->ssp_task.cmd->cmnd,
>>>>>>                           task->ssp_task.cmd->cmd_len);
>>>>>> -       cpu_id = smp_processor_id();
>>>>>> -       q_index = (u32) (cpu_id) % (pm8001_ha->max_q_num);
>>>>>> +       blk_tag = blk_mq_unique_tag(scmd->request);
>>>>>> +       q_index = blk_mq_unique_tag_to_hwq(blk_tag);
>>>>>>            circularQ = &pm8001_ha->inbnd_q_tbl[q_index];
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            /* Check if encryption is set */ @@ -4446,9 +4447,11 @@
>>>>>> static int pm80xx_chip_sata_req(struct pm8001_hba_info
>> *pm8001_ha,
>>>>>>            struct sas_task *task = ccb->task;
>>>>>>            struct domain_device *dev = task->dev;
>>>>>>            struct pm8001_device *pm8001_ha_dev = dev->lldd_dev;
>>>>>> +       struct ata_queued_cmd *qc = task->uldd_task;
>>>>>> +       struct scsi_cmnd *scmd = qc->scsicmd;
>>>>>>            u32 tag = ccb->ccb_tag;
>>>>>>            int ret;
>>>>>> -       u32 q_index, cpu_id;
>>>>>> +       u32 q_index, blk_tag;
>>>>>>            struct sata_start_req sata_cmd;
>>>>>>            u32 hdr_tag, ncg_tag = 0;
>>>>>>            u64 phys_addr, start_addr, end_addr; @@ -4459,8 +4462,9
>>>>>> @@ static int pm80xx_chip_sata_req(struct pm8001_hba_info
>> *pm8001_ha,
>>>>>>            unsigned long flags;
>>>>>>            u32 opc = OPC_INB_SATA_HOST_OPSTART;
>>>>>>            memset(&sata_cmd, 0, sizeof(sata_cmd));
>>>>>> -       cpu_id = smp_processor_id();
>>>>>> -       q_index = (u32) (cpu_id) % (pm8001_ha->max_q_num);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +       blk_tag = blk_mq_unique_tag(scmd->request);
>>>>>
>>>>> Here the scsi command is NULL.
>>>>>
>>>>>      if(scmd) {
>>>>>                    blk_tag = blk_mq_unique_tag(scmd->request);
>>>>>                    q_index = blk_mq_unique_tag_to_hwq(blk_tag);
>>>>>            } else {
>>>>>                    q_index = 0;
>>>>>      }
>>>>>
>>>>> With this change, we have started our testing. We will update you
>>>>> the
>>>> result soon.
>>>>>
>>>>>> +       q_index = blk_mq_unique_tag_to_hwq(blk_tag);
>>>>>>            circularQ = &pm8001_ha->inbnd_q_tbl[q_index];
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            if (task->data_dir == DMA_NONE) {
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 2.26.2
>>>>>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists